From: Dick Eastman <oldickeastman@q.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:59 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Items: Reagan brought down the Soviet Union. Ahmadinejad just made a crack that will bring the Global Money Power Conspiracy crashing down.
To:
    New Scientific Evidence Undermines Afghanistan  War On the eve  of the 9th anniversary of 9/11, support for the war in Afghanistan took a  serious blow today. Simultaneous press conferences were held in New York and Los  Angeles to present startling new information refuting the official 9/11  narrative, used to justify the war. Also announced were three major professional  groups which have joined the worldwide, and ever-growing, "9/11 Truth  Movement." Representatives of "Scientists for 9/11 Truth," "U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth" and "Actors & Artists for 9/11  Truth" presented their findings and unveiled their eye-opening websites.  Each non-profit group has launched a petition calling for a new, transparent  investigation. In NY, representing "Scientists," Professor Niels  Harrit said, "The official account put forth by NIST violates the fundamental  laws of physics and chemistry." In LA, physics teacher David Chandler discussed  the swift destruction of the WTC towers, including Building 7, the little-known  third tower. Having demonstrated its free fall, he confronted the US government  agency NIST with his analyses and forced NIST to revise its November 2008 Final  Report on WTC 7. NIST's Draft Report had claimed free fall was impossible but  NIST ultimately acknowledged WTC 7 was in absolute free fall for over two  seconds. Concluded Chandler, "Free fall is physically impossible without  explosives." In LA, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development Lt.  Col. Robert Bowman stated, "9/11 has been an excuse to use our brave young  troops as cannon fodder in unjust wars of aggression." Joint press  conference: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/pressConference_Videos.html     =============================== What do these American leaders have in common?   What about these?   Hint:  This man failed to make the list by a matter of a few inches  from his heart: Hint 2:  George Herbert Walker Bush was  only a heartbeat away from his job. All politicians stand for something. Men of the people stand in the way of something -  and often pay the price.      ========================================= Blackwater's Black Ops: Blackwater Paid Me to Buy Steroids  and Weapons on Black Market for its Shooters; Blackwater's cocaine  business and random shooting at Iraqi civilians 28 September  A.D. 2010 Article by  Jeremy Scahill:   ===============================================   Social Credit is Mankind's Answer to Debt Slavery under  inferior minds and small hearts, significant only because of inherited  weath, hired brains, and a secret subculture that cheats on all the  rules.  We owe them NOTHING.  They owe us  everything they have stolen  -- which is far more than all  the trillions they own --  a hundred times more -- because with  that wealth over the past nine decades we would have made a warless  utopia beyond anything they could imagine -- that not even the  scientists working for them could  imagine as they too  have been  constrained by poverty of the criminal minds they work for. No great political achievement is possible under debt slavery --  except one.  Abolishing it and raising up a system that brings out the good  that is in us.  Individualism and community can only flourish together --  when each has the means of realizing all the good that is in us. http://www.citizensamericaparty.org/socialcredit.htm The United States is rapidly  becoming the very first "post-industrial" nation on the globe.  All great  economic empires eventually become fat and lazy and squander the great wealth  that their forefathers have left them, but the pace at which America  is accomplishing this is absolutely amazing.  It was America that was at  the forefront of the industrial revolution.  It was America that showed the  world how to mass produce everything from automobiles to televisions to  airplanes.  It was the great American manufacturing base that crushed  Germany and Japan in World War II.  But now we are witnessing the  deindustrialization of America.  Tens of thousands of factories have  left the United States in the past decade alone.  Millions upon millions of  manufacturing jobs have been lost in the same time period.  The United  States has become a nation that consumes everything in sight and yet  produces increasingly little.  Do you know what our biggest  export is today?  Waste paper.  Yes, trash is the number one thing  that we ship out to the rest of the world as we voraciously blow our money on  whatever the rest of the world wants to sell to us.  The United States has  become bloated and spoiled and our economy is now  just a shadow  of what it once was.  Once upon a time America could literally  outproduce the rest of the world combined.  Today that is no longer true,  but Americans sure do consume more than anyone else in the world.  If the  deindustrialization of America continues at this current pace, what possible  kind of a future are we going to be leaving to our  children?   So how many tens of thousands more factories do we need to lose before we  do something about it?   ================   ================== Anti-Zionist  Rabbi teaches some real history to Zionists    ============ =================  
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/browse_thread/thread/caa850408e834f68  
Ex-BBIC Alan Hart on Current Issues TV: Israel may have  been involved in 9/11 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/browse_thread/thread/b2c470a5746ff4c9  
September 9, 2010,  Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909
Image painted by Western Media about Israel is completely false: example:  UN Fact-Finding Mission Says Israelis "Executed" Teenage US Citizen Furkan Dogan  on Peace Flotilla 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/browse_thread/thread/0d88ea205bc0efc7  
There likely already exists an exhaustive list of locations  that have no 
extradition treaty with "United States." It's interesting that  one such 
location is Abu Dhabi, and it's interesting that Erik Prince, the  
owner/CEO of Blackwater, now Xe (watch for more name changes as they try  
to distance themselves from the charges against them), now lives in Abu  
Dhabi.
Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas
http://www.thenation.com/article/154739/blackwaters-black-ops
 
Blackwater's Black Ops
Jeremy Scahill
September 15,  2010
Over the past several years, entities closely  linked to the private 
security firm Blackwater have provided intelligence,  training and 
security services to US and foreign governments as well as  several 
multinational corporations, including Monsanto, Chevron, the Walt  Disney 
Company, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines and banking giants Deutsche  Bank 
and Barclays, according to documents obtained by The Nation.  
Blackwater's work for corporations and government agencies was  
contracted using two companies owned by Blackwater's owner and founder,  
Erik Prince: Total Intelligence Solutions and the Terrorism Research  
Center (TRC). Prince is listed as the chairman of both companies in  
internal company documents, which show how the web of companies  
functions as a highly coordinated operation. Officials from Total  
Intelligence, TRC and Blackwater (which now calls itself Xe Services)  
did not respond to numerous requests for comment for this article.
US  Businessman: Blackwater Paid Me to Buy Steroids and Weapons on Black 
Market  for its Shooters (Blackwater, Iraqi Reconstruction and 
Occupation, War  Profiteering)
The businessman also alleges he witnessed Blackwater's  cocaine- and 
hashish-laced "frat parties gone wild" and random shooting at  Iraqi 
civilians.
Jeremy Scahill
One of the most incendiary  details in the documents is that Blackwater, 
through Total Intelligence,  sought to become the "intel arm" of 
Monsanto, offering to provide operatives  to infiltrate activist groups 
organizing against the multinational biotech  firm.
Governmental recipients of intelligence services and  counterterrorism 
training from Prince's companies include the Kingdom of  Jordan, the 
Canadian military and the Netherlands police, as well as several  US 
military bases, including Fort Bragg, home of the elite Joint Special  
Operations Command (JSOC), and Fort Huachuca, where military  
interrogators are trained, according to the documents. In addition,  
Blackwater worked through the companies for the Defense Intelligence  
Agency, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the US European  Command.
On September 3 the New York Times reported that Blackwater had  "created 
a web of more than 30 shell companies or subsidiaries in part to  obtain 
millions of dollars in American government contracts after the  security 
company came under intense criticism for reckless conduct in Iraq."  The 
documents obtained by The Nation reveal previously unreported details of  
several such companies and open a rare window into the sensitive  
intelligence and security operations Blackwater performs for a range of  
powerful corporations and government agencies. The new evidence also  
sheds light on the key roles of several former top CIA officials who  
went on to work for Blackwater.
The coordinator of Blackwater's  covert CIA business, former CIA 
paramilitary officer Enrique "Ric" Prado,  set up a global network of 
foreign operatives, offering their "deniability"  as a "big plus" for 
potential Blackwater customers, according to company  documents. The CIA 
has long used proxy forces to carry out extralegal  actions or to shield 
US government involvement in unsavory operations from  scrutiny. In some 
cases, these "deniable" foreign forces don't even know who  they are 
working for. Prado and Prince built up a network of such foreigners  
while Blackwater was at the center of the CIA's assassination program,  
beginning in 2004. They trained special missions units at one of  
Prince's properties in Virginia with the intent of hunting terrorism  
suspects globally, often working with foreign operatives. A former  
senior CIA official said the benefit of using Blackwater's foreign  
operatives in CIA operations was that "you wouldn't want to have  
American fingerprints on it."
While the network was originally  established for use in CIA operations, 
documents show that Prado viewed it  as potentially valuable to other 
government agencies. In an e-mail in  October 2007 with the subject line 
"Possible Opportunity in DEA—Read and  Delete," Prado wrote to a Total 
Intelligence executive with a pitch for the  Drug Enforcement 
Administration. That executive was an eighteen-year DEA  veteran with 
extensive government connections who had recently joined the  firm. Prado 
explained that Blackwater had developed "a rapidly growing,  worldwide 
network of folks that can do everything from surveillance to  ground 
truth to disruption operations." He added, "These are all foreign  
nationals (except for a few cases where US persons are the conduit but  
no longer 'play' on the street), so deniability is built in and should  
be a big plus."
The executive wrote back and suggested there "may be  an interest" in 
those services. The executive suggested that "one of the  best places to 
start may be the Special Operations Division, (SOD) which is  located in 
Chantilly, VA," telling Prado the name of the special agent in  charge. 
The SOD is a secretive joint command within the Justice Department,  run 
by the DEA. It serves as the command-and-control center for some of the  
most sensitive counternarcotics and law enforcement operations conducted  
by federal forces. The executive also told Prado that US attachés in  
Mexico; Bogotá, Colombia; and Bangkok, Thailand, would potentially be  
interested in Prado's network. Whether this network was activated, and  
for what customers, cannot be confirmed. A former Blackwater employee  
who worked on the company's CIA program declined to comment on Prado's  
work for the company, citing its classified status.
In November 2007  officials from Prince's companies developed a pricing 
structure for security  and intelligence services for private companies 
and wealthy individuals. One  official wrote that Prado had the capacity 
to "develop infrastructures" and  "conduct ground-truth and security 
activities." According to the pricing  chart, potential customers could 
hire Prado and other Blackwater officials  to operate in the United 
States and globally: in Latin America, North  Africa, francophone 
countries, the Middle East, Europe, China, Russia,  Japan, and Central 
and Southeast Asia. A four-man team headed by Prado for  
countersurveillance in the United States cost $33,600 weekly, while  
"safehouses" could be established for $250,000, plus operational costs.  
Identical services were offered globally. For $5,000 a day, clients  
could hire Prado or former senior CIA officials Cofer Black and Robert  
Richer for "representation" to national "decision-makers." Before  
joining Blackwater, Black, a twenty-eight-year CIA veteran, ran the  
agency's counterterrorism center, while Richer was the agency's deputy  
director of operations. (Neither Black nor Richer currently works for  
the company.)
As Blackwater became embroiled in controversy following  the Nisour 
Square massacre, Prado set up his own company, Constellation  Consulting 
Group (CCG), apparently taking some of Blackwater's covert CIA  work with 
him, though he maintained close ties to his former employer. In an  
e-mail to a Total Intelligence executive in February 2008, Prado wrote  
that he "recently had major success in developing capabilities in Mali  
[Africa] that are of extreme interest to our major sponsor and which  
will soon launch a substantial effort via my small shop." He requested  
Total Intelligence's help in analyzing the "North Mali/Niger terrorist  
problem."
In October 2009 Blackwater executives faced a crisis when  they could not 
account for their government-issued Secure Telephone Unit,  which is used 
by the CIA, the National Security Agency and other military  and 
intelligence services for secure communications. A flurry of e-mails  
were sent around as personnel from various Blackwater entities tried to  
locate the device. One former Blackwater official wrote that because he  
had left the company it was "not really my problem," while another  
declared, "I have no 'dog in this fight.'" Eventually, Prado stepped in,  
e-mailing the Blackwater officials to "pass my number" to the "OGA POC,"  
meaning the Other Government Agency (parlance for CIA) Point of  Contact.
What relationship Prado's CCG has with the CIA is not known. An  early 
version of his company's website boasted that "CCG professionals have  
already conducted operations on five continents, and have proven their  
ability to meet the most demanding client needs" and that the company  
has the "ability to manage highly-classified contracts." CCG, the site  
said, "is uniquely positioned to deliver services that no other company  
can, and can deliver results in the most remote areas with little or no  
outside support." Among the services advertised were "Intelligence and  
Counter-Intelligence (human and electronic), Unconventional Military  
Operations, Counterdrug Operations, Aviation Services, Competitive  
Intelligence, Denied Area Access...and Paramilitary Training."
The  Nation has previously reported on Blackwater's work for the CIA and 
JSOC in  Pakistan. New documents reveal a history of activity relating to 
Pakistan by  Blackwater. Former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto 
worked with the  company when she returned to Pakistan to campaign for 
the 2008 elections,  according to the documents. In October 2007, when 
media reports emerged that  Bhutto had hired "American security," senior 
Blackwater official Robert  Richer wrote to company executives, "We need 
to watch this carefully from a  number of angles. If our name surfaces, 
the Pakistani press reaction will be  very important. How that plays 
through the Muslim world will also need  tracking." Richer wrote that "we 
should be prepared to [sic] a communique  from an affiliate of Al-Qaida 
if our name surfaces (BW). That will impact  the security profile." 
Clearly a word is missing in the e-mail or there is a  typo that leaves 
unclear what Richer meant when he mentioned the Al Qaeda  communiqué. 
Bhutto was assassinated two months later. Blackwater officials  
subsequently scheduled a meeting with her family representatives in  
Washington, in January 2008.
Through Total Intelligence and the  Terrorism Research Center, Blackwater 
also did business with a range of  multinational corporations. According 
to internal Total Intelligence  communications, biotech giant 
Monsanto—the world's largest supplier of  genetically modified 
seeds—hired the firm in 2008–09. The relationship  between the two 
companies appears to have been solidified in January 2008  when Total 
Intelligence chair Cofer Black traveled to Zurich to meet with  Kevin 
Wilson, Monsanto's security manager for global issues.
After  the meeting in Zurich, Black sent an e-mail to other Blackwater 
executives,  including to Prince and Prado at their Blackwater e-mail 
addresses. Black  wrote that Wilson "understands that we can span 
collection from internet, to  reach out, to boots on the ground on legit 
basis protecting the Monsanto  [brand] name.... Ahead of the curve info 
and insight/heads up is what he is  looking for." Black added that Total 
Intelligence "would develop into acting  as intel arm of Monsanto." Black 
also noted that Monsanto was concerned  about animal rights activists and 
that they discussed how Blackwater "could  have our person(s) actually 
join [activist] group(s) legally." Black wrote  that initial payments to 
Total Intelligence would be paid out of Monsanto's  "generous protection 
budget" but would eventually become a line item in the  company's annual 
budget. He estimated the potential payments to Total  Intelligence at 
between $100,000 and $500,000. According to documents,  Monsanto paid 
Total Intelligence $127,000 in 2008 and $105,000 in  2009.
Reached by telephone and asked about the meeting with Black in  Zurich, 
Monsanto's Wilson initially said, "I'm not going to discuss it with  
you." In a subsequent e-mail to The Nation, Wilson confirmed he met  
Black in Zurich and that Monsanto hired Total Intelligence in 2008 and  
worked with the company until early 2010. He denied that he and Black  
discussed infiltrating animal rights groups, stating "there was no such  
discussion." He claimed that Total Intelligence only provided Monsanto  
"with reports about the activities of groups or individuals that could  
pose a risk to company personnel or operations around the world which  
were developed by monitoring local media reports and other publicly  
available information. The subject matter ranged from information  
regarding terrorist incidents in Asia or kidnappings in Central America  
to scanning the content of activist blogs and websites." Wilson asserted  
that Black told him Total Intelligence was "a completely separate entity  
from Blackwater."
Monsanto was hardly the only powerful corporation  to enlist the services 
of Blackwater's constellation of companies. The Walt  Disney Company 
hired Total Intelligence and TRC to do a "threat assessment"  for 
potential film shoot locations in Morocco, with former CIA officials  
Black and Richer reaching out to their former Moroccan intel  
counterparts for information. The job provided a "good chance to impress  
Disney," one company executive wrote. How impressed Disney was is not  
clear; in 2009 the company paid Total Intelligence just  $24,000.
Total Intelligence and TRC also provided intelligence  assessments on 
China to Deutsche Bank. "The Chinese technical  counterintelligence 
threat is one of the highest in the world," a TRC  analyst wrote, adding, 
"Many four and five star hotel rooms and restaurants  are live-monitored 
with both audio and video" by Chinese intelligence. He  also said that 
computers, PDAs and other electronic devices left unattended  in hotel 
rooms could be cloned. Cellphones using the Chinese networks, the  
analyst wrote, could have their microphones remotely activated, meaning  
they could operate as permanent listening devices. He concluded that  
Deutsche Bank reps should "bring no electronic equipment into China."  
Warning of the use of female Chinese agents, the analyst wrote, "If you  
don't have women coming onto you all the time at home, then you should  
be suspicious if they start coming onto you when you arrive in China."  
For these and other services, the bank paid Total Intelligence $70,000  
in 2009.
TRC also did background checks on Libyan and Saudi  businessmen for 
British banking giant Barclays. In February 2008 a TRC  executive 
e-mailed Prado and Richer revealing that Barclays asked TRC and  Total 
Intelligence for background research on the top executives from the  
Saudi Binladin Group (SBG) and their potential "associations/connections  
with the Royal family and connections with Osama bin Ladin." In his  
report, Richer wrote that SBG's chair, Bakr Mohammed bin Laden, "is well  
and favorably known to both arab and western intelligence service[s]"  
for cooperating in the hunt for Osama bin Laden. Another SBG executive,  
Sheikh Saleh bin Laden, is described by Richer as "a very savvy  
businessman" who is "committed to operating with full transparency to  
Saudi's security services" and is considered "the most vehement within  
the extended BL family in terms of criticizing UBL's actions and  beliefs."
In August Blackwater and the State Department reached a $42  million 
settlement for hundreds of violations of US export control  regulations. 
Among the violations cited was the unauthorized export of  technical data 
to the Canadian military. Meanwhile, Blackwater's dealings  with 
Jordanian officials are the subject of a federal criminal prosecution  of 
five former top Blackwater executives. The Jordanian government paid  
Total Intelligence more than $1.6 million in 2009.
Some of the  training Blackwater provided to Canadian military forces was 
in  Blackwater/TRC's "Mirror Image" course, where trainees live as a mock 
Al  Qaeda cell in an effort to understand the mindset and culture of 
insurgents.  Company literature describes it as "a classroom and field 
training program  designed to simulate terrorist recruitment, training, 
techniques and  operational tactics." Documents show that in March 2009 
Blackwater/TRC spent  $6,500 purchasing local tribal clothing in 
Afghanistan as well as assorted  "propaganda materials—posters, Pakistan 
Urdu maps, etc." for Mirror Image,  and another $9,500 on similar 
materials this past January in Pakistan and  Afghanistan.
According to internal documents, in 2009 alone the Canadian  military 
paid Blackwater more than $1.6 million through TRC. A Canadian  military 
official praised the program in a letter to the center, saying it  
provided "unique and valid cultural awareness and mission specific  
deployment training for our soldiers in Afghanistan," adding that it was  
"a very effective and operationally current training program that is  
beneficial to our mission."
This past summer Erik Prince put  Blackwater up for sale and moved to Abu 
Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. But he  doesn't seem to be leaving the 
shadowy world of security and intelligence.  He says he moved to Abu 
Dhabi because of its "great proximity to potential  opportunities across 
the entire Middle East, and great logistics," adding  that it has "a 
friendly business climate, low to no taxes, free trade and no  out of 
control trial lawyers or labor unions. It's pro-business and  
opportunity." It also has no extradition treaty with the United  States.
Any great nation throughout history has been great at  making things.  So if the United States continues to allow its  manufacturing base to erode at a staggering pace how in the world can the U.S.  continue to consider itself to be a great nation?  We have created the  biggest debt bubble in the history of the world in an effort to maintain a very  high standard of living, but the current state of affairs is not anywhere close  to sustainable.  Every single month America does into more debt and every  single month America gets poorer.
So what happens when the debt  bubble pops?
The deindustrialization of the United States should be  a top concern for every man, woman and child in the country.  But  sadly, most Americans do not have any idea what is going on around  them.
For people like that, take this article and print it out  and hand it to them.  Perhaps what they will read below will shock  them badly enough to awaken them from their  slumber.    
The following are 19 facts about  the deindustrialization of America that will blow your  mind....
#1 The United States has lost  approximately 42,400  factories since 2001.  About 75  percent of those factories employed over 500 people when they were  still in operation.
#2 Dell Inc., one  of America's largest manufacturers of computers, has announced  plans to dramatically expand its operations in China with an investment  of over $100  billion over the next  decade.
#3 Dell has announced that  it will be closing its last large U.S. manufacturing facility in  Winston-Salem, North Carolina in November.  Approximately  900  jobs will be  lost.
#4 In 2008, 1.2 billion cellphones  were sold worldwide.  So how many of them were manufactured inside the  United States?  Zero.
 #5 According to a new study  conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, if the U.S. trade deficit with  China continues to increase at its current rate, the U.S. economy  will lose over half a million  jobs this year  alone.
#6 As of the end of July, the U.S.  trade deficit with China had risen 18 percent compared to the same time period a  year ago.
#7 The United States has lost a  total of about 5.5 million  manufacturing jobs since October  2000.
#8 According to Tax  Notes, between 1999 and  2008 employment at the foreign affiliates of U.S. parent  companies increased an astounding 30 percent to 10.1 million. During  that exact same time period, U.S. employment at American multinational  corporations declined 8 percent to 21.1  million.
#9 In 1959, manufacturing  represented 28  percent of U.S. economic  output.  In 2008, it represented 11.5  percent.
#10 Ford Motor  Company recently announced the closure of a  factory that produces the Ford Ranger in St. Paul, Minnesota. Approximately 750 good paying middle  class jobs are going to be lost because making Ford Rangers in Minnesota does  not fit in with Ford's new "global" manufacturing  strategy.
#11 As of the end of 2009,  less than 12  million Americans worked in  manufacturing.  The last time less than 12 million Americans were employed  in manufacturing was in 1941.
#12 In the  United States today, consumption accounts for 70 percent of GDP. Of this 70  percent, over half is  spent on services.
#13 The United States has lost  a whopping 32  percent of its manufacturing  jobs since the year 2000.
#14 In 2001, the  United States ranked fourth in the world in per capita broadband Internet  use.  Today it ranks  15th.
#15 Manufacturing employment in  the U.S. computer industry is actually lower in 2010 than it was in  1975.
#16 Printed circuit boards are  used in tens of thousands of different products.  Asia now produces  84  percent of them  worldwide.
#17 The United States spends  approximately $3.90 on  Chinese goods for every $1 that the Chinese spend on goods from  the United States.
#18 One prominent  economist is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three  times larger than the U.S. economy  by the year 2040.
#19 The U.S. Census Bureau  says that 43.6 million Americans are now living in poverty and according to them  that is the highest number of poor Americans in the 51 years  that records have been kept.
How many millions  more Americans are going to become unemployed before we all admit that we have a  very, very serious problem on our hands?
How many more trillions of  dollars are going to leave the country before we realize that we are losing  wealth at a pace that is killing our economy?
How many once great  manufacturing cities are going to become rotting war zones like  Detroit before we understand that we are committing national economic  suicide?
The deindustrialization of America is a national  crisis.  It needs to be treated like one.
================
While the Midwest always gives us a few very good populist or "paleo-conservative" (pro-small business, non-interventionaist, anti-socialist, anti-debt) Republican congressmen, where was the GOP leadership from 2001 through 2008?
While I surely do not support the current administration and its globalist agenda, and, while I believe Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid represent a clear and present danger to the country at large, I find them no more repugnant than say, Karl Rove or Tom Delay; their personalities and intentions no less malignant than those of the neo-cons who set the overthrow of the sovereign United States into motion. I find them equally as frightening in their contempt for us, as I did Dick Cheney and his crew of fascist driven cohorts. And now you want to put the masterminds of this coup' back in control? What is it you think will change? What is it that you think these psychopaths and sociopaths are going to do to better the current crisis in our government?
How quickly and conveniently so many of you have forgotten that it was the Republicans, lead by the neo-con faction, who gave us the unconstitutional:
Patriot Acts;
John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007; a bill which gave the president the unlawful authority to:
declare anyone of us a domestic terrorist for resisting the growing tyranny of our own government;
to strip us of our citizenship without due process,
to jail us indefinitely without charges,
without notifying anyone of our whereabouts and
denying us access to legal council.
Who condoned and encouraged the illegal wiretapping and spying on American citizens for no apparent reason other than there was nothing we could do to stop it.
Who entered into unlawful civil assistance agreements with foreign nations to allow the use of their troops against us on US soil, just in case we get too upset over the loss of our freedom
Created the behemoth Homeland Security Department, a collecting of more than 21 intelligence agencies under one roof for no other purpose than protecting the Corporate Federal Government…FROM US!
The creation of Fusion centers in every state dedicated to intercepting emails, phones calls and collecting every piece of information they can on us
Creation of the FBI's Infragard ; community leaders empowered to use deadly force to protect the infrastructure in case of an emergency (strange: since we own virtually none of our infrastructure having seen large portions of it sold off to foreign investors)
The absolute deregulation and oversight of banking, housing and Wall Street largely giving these greed driven fools a license to steal…..and they did.
The militarization of our local law enforcement agencies, now all under the control HSD, and many departments now an active threat to the public.
The refusal to secure the southern border
The creation of the Security & Prosperity Partnership, the framework for the North American Union, ending our sovereignty and national identity once and for all.
WE are the focus of every bill that came down; not foreign terrorists. It was our rights that were taken away. It was the citizens of the United States who were punished for the attacks on 9/11. There isn't a foreign terrorist out there who gives a rats rear end what laws we pass regarding terrorist activities; not that we have actually passed any laws that would pertain to them. Every law passed, every right taken away, every right violated and every penalty assessed was levied against the citizens of the United States. So who is it you think the Republicans with their neo-con leaders were focused on? Foreign terrorists…..or you?
Who, by virtue of all these listed activities and many more, was deemed a threat to the government? Read the bills. The only thing missing in them is your specific name. All of this brought to you by the Republicans during the Bush Administrations.
The Democrats, doing their part to subvert our Constitution and our sovereignty, have expanded and enlarged an ever more tyrannical centralized corporate government. The Republicans if voted back into control will just continue the process.
We have no real options. The Democrats have been just as malevolent, just as malignant, just as destructive and contemptuous of us as the Republicans. Changing who gets to be in front of the camera first will not change the direction our country is headed.
We need a vote of "no confidence" on our ballots. If our elections truly do mean anything, if our votes really count, we need the option of saying "no" to any and all.
The situation has become one not of "You're either with us or you're with the terrorist's" (Bush 2001), it is instead:
"You are either with us or you work for the government".
The gov't has become the law breaker-the terrist with gestapo police, dirty judges, create a crime legislation that hold We the Ppl to a greater degree of accountability to the rule of law than GPS'es, BP, Bankers, AIPAC/mossad/Amdocs spies
Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the criminal law, the end justifies the means -- to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.
Read the dissent by Judge Brandies;
Olmstead v. United States
LOCATION (URL) -
http://www.redress.cc/americas/mocathail20100928
SYNOPSIS - Maidhc Ó Cathail argues that it is vital for the American public to
understand that unconditional support for Israel is doing incalculable damage
to the US national interest and that, to steer US policy back so that it serves
the American people, it is crucial to break the Israel lobby's stranglehold
over policy-making and the media.
Article here: http://www.redress.cc/americas/mocathail20100928
http://mwcnews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5455&Itemid=126
Ahmadinejad's UN 9-11 Speech
by Gideon Polya, Media With Conscience, 25 September 2010
Top scientists and intelligence experts dispute the "official US version" of what happened on 9-11 and variously assert that people within the US Government did 9-11 (possibly with Israeli assistance). President Ahmadinejad's 9-11speech at the UN merely advances 3 logical, testable, scientific hypotheses about 9-11 but has immediately elicited hysterical, egregiously dishonest, anti-science and anti-truth responses from Western leaders and Mainstream media.
The immediate responses involved a walk-out of US representatives and its lackeys from 30 countries, including Australia, Britain, Sweden and Spain, from the speech itself – they simply didn't want to hear anything differing from the "official US version" of 9-11.
Western media and politicians immediately started falsely and hysterically  reporting Ahmadinejad's comments on 9-11. President Ahmadinejad's speech merely  offered 3 scientific  hypotheses about the cause of 9-11, namely  (1) the "official US version" of a "terrorist group",  (2) US responsibility and (3) US complicity in  allowing a terrorist operation to proceed.
 
The UK BBC was an  exception and its report was factual:
"23 September 2010. The US and other delegations at the 65th UN General  Assembly have walked out in protest at the speech by the Iranian president.  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said some saw the 11 September attacks on the US as part of  a US conspiracy to protect Israel. He was speaking on the first day of the  week-long UN diplomatic marathon."
 
Similarly the Australian  ABC:
"Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has told the United Nations that most people believe the US government was responsible for the attacks of September 11, 2001."
Indeed the only arguable part of President Ahmadinejad's speech was "The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view [that the US did 9-11]" – he would probably have been correct in stating that a "substantial proportion" rather than "the majority" thought that the US was involved in the 9-11 atrocity. Thus prior Mainstream polls have indicated that about one third of Americans believe that 9-11 was an inside job involving the US Government.
Science is about critically testing potentially falsifiable hypotheses and that is all that President Ahmadinejad has advocated in relation to 9-11:
"It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the II September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden."
In contrast, the US and US lackey representatives who blocked their ears and walked out of the UN General Assembly and those who then lied about President Ahmadinejad's speech must be condemned for an anti-science stance that is antithetical to finding out what happened on 9-11 and getting justice for the victims and their relatives.
To read what President Ahmadinejad actually said here is the transcript of President Ahmadinejad's speech to the UN on 23 September 2010
Having read what President Ahmadinejad actually said, now consider the offensive, anti-science lying by Obama, US lackeys and Western media who – for what ever reasons – are opposed to a scientific approach to 9-11.
Obama's response on Ahmadinejad's call for scientific investigation of 9-11 (BBC):
""There were candlelight vigils and I think a natural sense of shared humanity and sympathy was expressed within Iran. It just shows once again the difference between how the Iranian leadership and this regime operates and how I think the vast majority of the Iranian people, who are respectful and thoughtful, think about these issues….It was offensive. It was hateful. And particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones. People of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation. For him to make a statement like that was inexcusable."
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon also condemned Ahmadinejad's call for scientific investigation of 9-11 (Ynet)
"I strongly condemn the comments made yesterday by a leader of a delegation that called into question the cause of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on US soil. It is unacceptable for the platform of the General Assembly of the United Nations to be misused in this way."
EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton has said the following:
"[Ahmadinejad's suggestion] that the United States was in any way  responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks or that the majority of people in the  US believe this to be the case, is outrageous and unacceptable. It is for this  reason that all representatives of the 27 nations of the EU walked out."  
 
The Rupert Murdoch-owned New York Post reported  President Ahmadinejad's speech under the following headline: "A'jad  spew-&-shoo. US and world diplos walk out on Iranian's vile 9/11 rant at  UN". 
 
President Ahmadinejad, like all leaders, can be  legitimately criticized for all sorts of things. However on 9-11 he is correct  in demanding a proper scientific inquiry into who did 9-11. Those like war  criminal Obama who condemn Ahmadinejad's call for a proper inquiry into 9-11 are  in effect calling for an ongoing cover-up and can  thus be seen to be  witting or unwitting accessories after the fact of the 9-11  atrocity.
 
Further, the deaths associated with the 9-11 atrocity  (3,000) are dwarfed  by the 8 million violent deaths and non-violent  avoidable deaths in the post-9-11, US-led War on Terror, the breakdown being 2.5  million (Iraq), 4.5 million (Afghanistan) and 0.8 million global opiate  drug-related deaths linked to US Alliance restoration of the Taliban-destroyed  Afghan opium industry (from 6% of world market share in 2001 to over 90%  today).
 
A sensible way to publicly get to the truth about 9-11 as  advocated by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would be war crimes trials  before the International Criminal Court (ICC) of US Alliance leaders associated  with the ongoing Muslim Holocaust and with charges including, as  appropriate,  complicity in 9-11 or being accessories after the fact of  9-11. George Bush, Tony Blair, Barack Obama, Gordon Brown, David Cameron,  Nicolas Sarkozy, Stephen Harper, Angela Merkel, John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Julia  Gillard, their "we were just obeying orders" subordinates and their Mainstream  media collaborators should all be arraigned before the International Criminal  Court.
related:
http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm Highest Treason Substantiated
Truth will set US free: breaking Israel's stranglehold over American foreign policy, and also over domestic policy that restricts freedoms......
Senior Democrat Pat Leahy introduces outrageous bill to censor Internet websites
DECAY IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM....THAT WOULD BE YOU ERIC HOLDER, More Americans Losing Their Liberties Every Day
Reaping Zionist terror's reward: get in there first – that's the secret and steal others' lives, land, wealth, future.....
Burying Nuclear Waste in the Palestinian Territories
Palestinian farmers from Yatta village south of Hebron in the West Bank have revealed that the Israeli military continues to bury nuclear waste in their farmlands at Al-Masafer near the armistice line in the West Bank. The farmers said that the military forces "IDF" brings trucks loaded with waste suspected to be radioactive waste and is burying it in their lands after they force them to evacuate the area.
The farmers said that they were able to hide themselves in some caves and watch the military operation. They stated that the Israeli soldiers who declared the area as a military zone were wearing white overalls over their military uniforms during the burial. The farmers said that they live in Al-Masafer with their animals. continued
28 September A.D. 2010
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gaErfGMRZPezHVhbz0Iv5it0oww
US judge declares mistrial in case of 2 ex-Blackwater  contractors accused of killing Afghans
By The Associated  Press (CP) 
NORFOLK, Va. - A federal judge declared a mistrial Monday in  the case of  two former Blackwater workers accused of murdering two unarmed  Afghan  civilians and wounding a third man in Kabul.
The jury came  out deadlocked just before 11 a.m. EDT (1500 GMT) after  several days of  deliberations, WAVY-TV in Norfolk reported on its  website. A new trial  date was set for March 1.
They both face murder, assault and weapons  charges that could send them  to prison for life.
Prosecutors said  Justin H. Cannon, 28, and Christopher Drotleff, 30, had  been drinking  alcohol all day and had taken two company vehicles and  weapons off of the  U.S. camp without permission when they shot into a  fleeing vehicle on a  street on May 5, 2009.
Cannon and Drotleff told investigators that they  feared for their lives  and suspected the car could be a suicide bomber.  Neither testified  during the weeklong trial.
U.S. District Judge  Robert G. Doumar granted Cannon and Drotleff a bond hearing, set for  Wednesday, according to The Virginian-Pilot, of Norfolk.
"My client and  his family are extremely upset that the jury was not able  to reach a  verdict acquitting him," said Lawrence H. Woodward Jr., one  of Drotleff's  attorneys. "I always believed and continue to believe that  they acted in  self defence. Any person in those circumstances would have  acted the way  they did."
Cannon's attorneys were not immediately available for comment  after court.
Drotleff's wife left the courthouse in tears. Cannon's  father declined  to comment.
The jury of nine women and three men  told the judge they were about  equally split between those who wanted to  acquit the men and those who  felt they should be convicted.
Cannon,  of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Drotleff, of Virginia Beach, were  in the  country to provide weapons training for the Afghan National Army. 
They were  working for North Carolina-based Blackwater Worldwide, which  is now known  as Xe Services.
During the trial, jurors viewed the bullet-riddled Toyota  Corolla at the  centre of the deadly encounter and heard from two Afghan  nationals who  said they feared for their lives if they did not lie about  the events of  that night. One testified that he lied when he said the  defendants had  not been drinking.
Cannon and Drotleff fired about  30 rounds - Cannon with an AK47 and  Drotleff with a 9mm pistol - hitting  two men in the car and a bystander  who was walking his dog with a friend.  One man in the car and the man on  the street died from gunshot  wounds.
Copyright C 2010 The Canadian Press. All rights  reserved.
NOW they are working to keep the information SECRET.
Now why would they do that? National Security?
We have been destroying Afghanistan for 8 years now. I would love to
hear one scenario there the disclosure of this information would put
anyone in danger EXCEPT the people who are working to protect themselves
from the opinion of the US Citizenry. It can not possibly put us in
danger from anyone else.
The classification 'National Security' is well past being abused. It
is now used to keep the misfits, liars, schemers, haters of the
Constitution and Law, manipulators and outright criminals from ever
being accountable. It is no more than a cloak of invisibility wrapped up
in the Red White and Blue.
If what we were told was accurate and truthful, there would be NO
REASON to keep the information from us.
And to admit to using US Treasury money...our tax money...to buy up all
the books and then burn them? Where did the Pentagon get that kind of
authority to waste our taxes and protect themselves from scrutiny?
This is a very new development to keep We the People OUT of our own
Government. If someone tried this even to a minimal extent, say in the
early 1970's (and it DID) that President would be held responsible. But
now days, the Speaker of the House has exclusive say on that subject,
not We the People.
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments:
Post a Comment